ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
High-Precision Demodulation Method for Multi-FP Cavity Sensors Based on Filter Optimization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibre-optic Fabry-Pérot (FP) multi-cavity sensors hold significant promise for multi-parameter measurements in extreme environments. However, precisely demodulating signals from each cavity within the composite interference spectrum remains a key bottleneck that limits measurement accuracy. To address this issue, this paper proposes a high-precision demodulation method that combines digital filtering with distortion region suppression. This method first uses digital bandpass filters to separate the interference signals from each sub-cavity from the composite spectrum. It then removes the spectral regions distorted by the filters, retaining only the stable central spectral band for interference order fitting and cavity length calculation. To comprehensively evaluate the method, we systematically compared the distortion characteristics of six finite impulse response (FIR) window-function filters and three infinite impulse response (IIR) filters during spectral separation, along with their impact on demodulation accuracy. Simulation results show that, within the 490-510 μm cavity-length range, FIR filtering combined with distortion suppression reduces the demodulation error to below 0.04 nm, approaching the theoretical limit. In contrast, the best-performing IIR filter still yields an error of 0.58 nm after the same processing. Furthermore, in simulations covering a wide range of 200-800 μm, the maximum demodulation error of this method is less than 0.53 nm, demonstrating its excellent robustness. In dual-cavity temperature sensing experiments, the partial-spectrum demodulation strategy with distortion suppression reduced the standard deviation of cavity-length fluctuations from 0.112 nm to 0.072 nm, and the maximum adjacent point jump from 2.158 nm to 0.464 nm, compared with full-spectrum demodulation. This significantly enhances the continuity and stability of demodulation. This study not only provides a high-precision, highly robust demodulation scheme for multi-cavity FP sensors but also offers clear theoretical and experimental grounds for selecting and optimising digital filters in practical engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.