ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Mapping Mutations and Signaling Network Interactions to Guide Precision Therapy in Gallbladder Cancer.
Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGallbladder cancer (GBC) is a biologically complex malignancy arising from the epithelial lining of the gallbladder, with adenocarcinoma constituting the major histological subtype. Early detection is challenging because of vague clinical manifestations and the organ's deep-seated anatomical location, resulting in diagnosis at advanced stages and limited treatment options. Consequently, patients often experience poor prognosis with low 5-year survival rates. Clinical and translational studies have demonstrated marked biological heterogeneity in GBC, primarily driven by diverse molecular alterations that fuel tumor initiation and progression.
methodsIn the present study, we investigated recurrently mutated genes in GBC using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) gallbladder cohorts, focusing on genes with a mutation frequency above a pre-specified threshold (≥ 5% in at least one dataset). We then cross-referenced these genes with published literature till date in GBC and other solid tumors where the same variants have been functionally characterized as loss-of-function or gain-of-function. "Likely loss of function" was assigned only when mutations were annotated in OncoKB/COSMIC as truncating/nonsense or as missense variants with experimental or strong computational evidence of functional impairment.
resultsEvaluation and the functional impact of prominent mutations viz. TP53, SMAD4, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, ARID1A, ARID2, KRAS, ELF3, ERBB3, ERBB2, STK11, and CTNNB1 on key cellular signaling pathways that regulate GBC initiation and progression. These alterations influence various oncogenic mechanisms, including cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis evasion, and metastatic potential, by disrupting pathways. By comparing the mutational patterns observed in GBC with those reported in other malignancies sharing analogous molecular signatures, we delineate potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.
conclusionsMutation-guided therapeutic approaches hold great promise for advancing precision medicine in GBC. By tailoring treatments to the specific molecular alterations driving tumor development, this could pave the way for more effective interventions and improved patient outcomes in a disease long constrained by limited therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.