Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817206›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of comparative neurology2026

Structure Guides Function: Beyond Pairwise Neural Interactions.

Alexander Maier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander MaierDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7250-502X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central theme in Jon Kaas' research, celebrated in this issue, is the relationship between brain structure and function. As a tribute, we examine how certain neuroanatomical structures enable higher order (higher arity) functions whose joint effects cannot be recovered from pairwise measurements. Specifically, we argue that neurons exploit coincident input detection to realize higher order operations that cannot be derived by studying any of the pairwise combinations in isolation. Pairwise statistics can miss these irreducible higher order (more-than-pairwise) effects. We advocate for an extension of graph-based models to hypergraphs to formally capture and analyze these irreducible higher order neural interactions. Based on several recent studies, we discuss both the applicability and benefits of higher order neural data analyses.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsAnimalsHumanshigher arityhigher orderhypergraphsneuronal information processing

Identifiers

PMID42817206
PMCPMC13627964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.