Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817041›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2026

Low-Dose Cytarabine Plus G-CSF Induction in Pediatric M2 Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Study.

Wenxin Ou, Xiaohua Zhu, Jun Lu, Hongsheng Wang, Ning Liao, Yufeng Liu, Hua Jiang, Qi An, Xiaojun Yuan, Hailong He and 12 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Wenxin OuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-5619
Xiaohua ZhuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Jun LuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hongsheng WangDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0831-9641
Ning LiaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yufeng LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hua JiangDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4552-0785
Qi AnDepartment of Hematology, Xuzhou Children's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Xiaojun YuanXinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1463-6790
Hailong HeDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Ningling WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Anhui Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jixia LuoChildren's Hospital of Kaifeng City, Kaifeng City, China.
Xiuli JuDepartment of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Qian-Fei WangChina National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0086-2626
Minghua YangDepartment of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-1209
Cheng ChengDepartment of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Peifang XiaoDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-7930
Liangchun YangDepartment of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Li GaoMedical Center of Hematology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9188-9236
Raul C RibeiroDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-5647
Shaoyan HuDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-6957
Xiaowen ZhaiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-0302

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC2705003National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFC2706301National Natural Science Foundation of China 82141125Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21Y31900302Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 24Y12800602Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC12019121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective secondary analysis of the multicenter randomized CALS III-AML18 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose chemotherapy (LDC) compared with standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC) in children with M2 acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M2). A total of 221 children were included, with 109 in the LDC arm and 112 in the SDC arm. The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) rates after induction I and II were 67.0% versus 70.5% (p = 0.568) and 84.4% versus 89.3% (p = 0.740), respectively. The 3 year overall survival (OS) rates were 81.2% ± 3.9% and 86.9% ± 3.3% in the LDC and SDC arms, respectively (p = 0.304). The corresponding 3 year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 82.0% ± 3.8% and 88.1% ± 3.1% (p = 0.205), and the 3 year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 62.1% ± 4.8% and 70.8% ± 4.4% (p = 0.218). Among patients with KIT mutations, outcomes were poorer in the LDC arm than in the SDC arm, including 3 year OS (67.1% ± 8.7% vs. 91.5% ± 4.1%, p = 0.011), RFS (70.6% ± 7.8% vs. 87.5% ± 4.8%, p = 0.038), and EFS (49.2% ± 8.7% vs. 81.0% ± 5.7%, p = 0.002). Among patients who developed sepsis, grade 3-5 events were less frequent in the LDC arm than in the SDC arm (33.3% vs. 78.8%, p < 0.001). LDC was also associated with faster neutrophil and platelet recovery, lower transfusion requirements, and reduced treatment costs during induction. No statistically significant differences in remission or survival outcomes were observed between LDC and SDC, while the LDC regimen showed a lower treatment-related burden. These findings support further evaluation of LDC as a toxicity-sparing induction strategy in selected pediatric patients with AML-M2. The poorer outcomes observed among patients with KIT mutations warrant caution when considering treatment de-intensification in this subgroup.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyInfantMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionCytarabineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factoracute myeloid leukemiainduction regimenM2 subtypeprognosis

Identifiers

PMID42817041
PMCPMC13627885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.