Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817019›Full record

ReviewReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2026

Recent Advances and Emerging Applications in Embryo Vitrification for Livestock.

Cristina Cuello, Marcos Torregrosa-Fuentes, Manuela Garcia-Canovas, Adelina Lopez-Jara, Inmaculada Parrilla, Maria A Gil, Emilio A Martinez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina CuelloDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Marcos Torregrosa-FuentesDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Manuela Garcia-CanovasDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9317-0188
Adelina Lopez-JaraDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Inmaculada ParrillaDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Maria A GilDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-7750
Emilio A MartinezDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1260-9721

Funding

Fundación Séneca 22959/FPI/25Fundación Séneca 23014/GERM/25Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2022-137645OB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2022-138666OB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PREP2022-000404Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PREP2022-000437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitrification has progressively supplanted conventional slow freezing as the method of choice for embryo cryopreservation in both human medicine and animal production, particularly for in vitro-produced embryos and for species or developmental stages highly sensitive to conventional freezing. By combining very high cooling and warming rates with concentrated cryoprotectant solutions and minimal sample volumes, it largely prevents intracellular ice formation and, in experienced hands, consistently yields post-warming survival and developmental rates that exceed those obtained with traditional controlled-rate freezing. In this review, we synthesize recent technical and biological advances in embryo vitrification, with particular attention to cryoprotectant formulations, carrier devices, cooling-rate control and current strategies to enhance cryotolerance. For the main livestock species-cattle, horses, pigs and small ruminants-we outline the present state of this technology, highlighting where vitrification has become routine practice and where adoption remains limited or experimental. Despite the clear progress achieved, implementation in field conditions is still heterogeneous, and truly standardized, species-adapted protocols-ideally amenable to automation and direct transfer-are yet to be fully established.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo, MammalianLivestockVitrificationAnimalsCryoprotective AgentsHorsesCryoprotective Agentsbovinecryopreservationembryoequinelivestockporcinesmall ruminantsvitrification

Identifiers

PMID42817019
PMCPMC13627854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.