In one paragraphArticle in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
8 authors.
A Lopez-JaraDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
X ToptsikiotiDepartment of Agriculture, School of Geotechnical Sciences, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
M Garcia-CanovasDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9317-0188 C CuelloDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
M A GilDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-7750 H Rodriguez-MartinezDepartment of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences (BKV), BKH/Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-2124 E A MartinezDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1260-9721 I ParrillaDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Funding
Fundación Séneca FSRM/10.13039/100007801Linköpings Universitet Project LiU-303668Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades AEI/10.13039/501100011033Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Project PID2022-137645OB-I00
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
This study explores alternative freezing approaches aimed at reducing or avoiding the use of liquid nitrogen (LN
Indexed as
CryopreservationSemen PreservationAnimalsFreezingHydrogen PeroxideMaleNitrogenSemenSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm MotilitySwineHydrogen PeroxideNitrogen−80°C storageboar spermcryopreservationliquid nitrogen reduction
Identifiers
PMID42816937
PMCPMC13627740
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390