Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816930›Full record

ReviewReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2026

Sperm Recovery and Evaluation in Domestic Species: Challenges and Current Practices.

A J Soler, O García-Álvarez, M Iniesta-Cuerda, P Jiménez-Rabadán, A Maroto-Morales, M Neila-Montero, V Montoro, M R Fernández-Santos, J J Garde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A J SolerGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-5157
O García-ÁlvarezGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4310-0557
M Iniesta-CuerdaGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2802-1925
P Jiménez-RabadánGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.
A Maroto-MoralesGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.
M Neila-MonteroGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2180-9434
V MontoroGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-669X
M R Fernández-SantosGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3359-1623
J J GardeGrupo SaBio, IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), ETSIAMB, Albacete, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-6518

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RTA2005-00091-CO2-01Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RZ2006-00006-CO3-01Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria RZ2008-0009-CO2Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha PCC08-0105Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha PIB-05-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semen collection is a key step in the development of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in domestic mammals, as the collection method determines the functionality and fertility of the sperm. The artificial vagina or manual collection yields ejaculates similar to those obtained during natural mating, although they require prior training to enable semen collection. When semen collection cannot be achieved using the aforementioned techniques, alternative methods such as electroejaculation may be employed. This method has been associated with increased stress and pain in animals; therefore, it should be restricted to specific cases and combined with rectal massage and the administration of sedatives. Finally, spermatozoa can be recovered post-mortem from the cauda epididymis where they are already capable of fertilizing oocytes. After sperm collection, the evaluation of sample quality is essential to ensure success following the application of ARTs. Alongside the techniques commonly used in animal reproduction laboratories, more advanced and objective methodologies have been developed using technologies such as computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) or flow cytometry. CASA systems enable the quantitative assessment of sperm motility at the individual cell level and the identification of sperm subpopulations associated with fertility. In parallel, flow cytometry expands analytical capabilities by allowing the simultaneous evaluation of multiple parameters indicative of sperm function in a single cell. This review summarizes the main methods of sperm collection across domestic mammal species, describing the respective advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, it provides an overview of the current methodologies for semen quality assessment and highlights the need for further advances in the identification of reliable fertility biomarkers.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm RetrievalAnimalsFlow CytometryMaleReproductive Techniques, AssistedSpecimen HandlingSperm Motilityartificial vaginaCASAelectroejaculationepididymal spermflow cytometrysperm quality

Identifiers

PMID42816930
PMCPMC13627748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.