Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816916›Full record

ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2026

Comparative Susceptibility of Donkey and Horse Sperm to Liquid-Storage Temperature.

Pilar Vallejo-Soto, Antonio González Ariza, Blenda R N Vilela, Carlos Montero-Palma, Rocío Rodríguez González-Miranda, Verónica Pérez-Aguilera, Francisco Crespo-Castejón, Manuel Hidalgo, Jesús Dorado, Isabel Ortiz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pilar Vallejo-SotoVeterinary Reproduction Group (AGR-275), Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5199-6981
Antonio González ArizaAgropecuary Provincial Centre, Diputación Provincial de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6697-3591
Blenda R N VilelaVeterinary Reproduction Group (AGR-275), Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-8581
Carlos Montero-PalmaVeterinary Reproduction Group (AGR-275), Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8870-9067
Rocío Rodríguez González-MirandaVeterinary Reproduction Group (AGR-275), Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Verónica Pérez-AguileraCentro Militar de Cría Caballar de Ávila, Cría Caballar de Las Fuerzas Armadas, Ávila, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3404-2137
Francisco Crespo-CastejónCentro Militar de Cría Caballar de Ávila, Cría Caballar de Las Fuerzas Armadas, Ávila, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6946-3527
Manuel HidalgoVeterinary Reproduction Group (AGR-275), Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-7422
Jesús DoradoVeterinary Reproduction Group (AGR-275), Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-7663
Isabel OrtizVeterinary Reproduction Group (AGR-275), Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2479-498X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) FinanceCode001Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-116090RB-I00Ministerio de Universidades FPU23/03472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation protocols for donkey sperm are based on those developed for horses, despite potential interspecific differences in cooling tolerance. This study compared horse and donkey sperm during long-term storage at 5°C and 17°C. Ejaculates from four stallions and four jacks (n = 16) were centrifuged, resuspended in skimmed milk-based extender, and stored at both temperatures. Sperm motility, plasma and acrosome membrane integrity, and morphology were evaluated after 1, 2 and 7 days. Fresh semen parameters showed no interspecific differences (p > 0.05). At 5°C, donkey sperm showed reduced motility and membrane integrity from Day 1, whereas horse sperm parameters remained stable at both temperatures up to Day 2. After 7 days, horse doses stored at 5°C maintained significantly higher quality. In conclusion, donkey sperm was more sensitive to storage at 5°C than horse sperm, highlighting the need for species-specific preservation strategies.

Indexed as

EquidaeSemen PreservationSpermatozoaAcrosomeAnimalsHorsesMaleSemen AnalysisSpecies SpecificitySperm MotilityTemperatureequineinterspecific differencesjacksemen preservationstallion

Identifiers

PMID42816916
PMCPMC13627757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.