Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816906›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic and prognostic research2026

Scoping review of methodology for aiding generalisability and transportability of clinical prediction models.

Kritchavat Ploddi, Glen P Martin, Maurice O'Connell, Matthew Sperrin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kritchavat PloddiDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. kritchavat.ploddi@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1855-3968
Glen P MartinDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Maurice O'ConnellDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9658-495X
Matthew SperrinDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

the National Institute for Health and Care Research Artificial Intelligence for Multiple Long-Term Conditions (AIM) call on the DynAIRx Project: Artificial Intelligence for dynamic prescribing optimisation and care integration in multimorbidity NIHR 203986the UKRI AI programme, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, for CHAI - EPSRC AI Hub for Causality in Healthcare AI with Real Data EP/Y028856/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneralisability and transportability of clinical prediction models (CPMs) refer to their ability to maintain predictive performance when applied to new populations. While CPMs may show good generalisability or transportability to a specific new population, it is rare for a CPM to be developed using methods that prioritise good generalisability or transportability. There is an emerging literature of such techniques; therefore, this scoping review aims to summarise the main methodological approaches, assumptions, advantages, disadvantages and future development of methodology aiding the generalisability and transportability of CPMs.

methodsRelevant articles were systematically searched from MEDLINE, Embase, medRxiv, arxiv databases until August 2023 using a predefined set of search terms. Extracted information included methodology description, assumptions, applied examples, advantages and disadvantages.

resultsThe searches found 1,761 articles; 172 were retained for full text screening; 18 were finally included. We categorised the methodologies based on whether they are data-driven or knowledge-driven, and whether they are generalisable or transportable to specific target population. Data-driven approaches range from data augmentation to ensemble methods and density ratio weighting, while knowledge-driven strategies rely on causal methodology.

conclusionsFuture research could focus on comparing these methodologies across simulated and real datasets to identify their strengths and weaknesses in broad applications, as well as synthesising these approaches for enhancing their practical usefulness.

Indexed as

Causal inferenceClinical prediction modelsDataset shiftGeneralisabilityTransportability

Identifiers

PMID42816906
PMCPMC13629139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.