Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816880›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Effect of dietary chitosan supplementation on intestinal barrier function and growth performance in weaned piglets challenged by Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli.

Jiahao Liu, Simona De Blasio, Kunhong Xie, Xiang Li, Yuheng Luo, Ping Zheng, Xiangbing Mao, Hui Yan, Quyuan Wang, Liam Good and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jiahao LiuInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Simona De BlasioDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Camden, London, NW1 0TU, UK.
Kunhong XieInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Xiang LiInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Yuheng LuoInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Ping ZhengInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Xiangbing MaoInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Hui YanInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Quyuan WangInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Liam GoodDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Camden, London, NW1 0TU, UK.
Ludovic PelligandInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China. lpelligand@rvc.ac.uk.
Jun HeInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, People's Republic of China. hejun8067@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32372897the European Union Horizon 2020 project AVANT 862829the Porcine Innovation Team of Sichuan Province SCCXTD-2024-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 (EHEC) is an important zoonotic pathogen that disrupts intestinal epithelial barrier integrity and induces excessive inflammatory responses, leading to impaired growth performance and intestinal injury. EHEC is also an important cause hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in children and older adults. In pig production, chitosan is considered a promising alternative to antibiotics due to its bioadhesive and antimicrobial properties, but the effects and underlying mechanisms of chitosan (COS) under pathogenic challenge remain to be elucidated.

resultsOne hundred and eight pigs were randomly divided into three treatment groups: an unchallenged control (CON), an EHEC-challenged control (ECON), and an EHEC-challenged group supplemented with 100 mg/kg COS (ECOS). Results show that EHEC challenge increased the feed conversion ratio (FCR), increased inflammatory cytokine levels, disrupted intestinal morphology, and downregulated tight junction and nutrient transporter gene expression (P < 0.05). Dietary COS supplementation decreased FCR during days 6-14 (P < 0.05) and tended to improve average daily gain (ADG) over the same period (0.05 < P < 0.10). Moreover, COS tended to decrease faecal shedding of total E. coli (P = 0.085) and EHEC, attenuated systemic inflammation by decreasing serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels, and enhanced humoral immunity as indicated by increased IgA and IgM concentrations (P < 0.05). Importantly, COS alleviated EHEC-induced intestinal injury by restoring villus height and villus-to-crypt ratio, with enhanced mucosal digestive enzyme activities, and upregulated expression of tight junction proteins (ZO-1 and occludin) and nutrient transporters (SGLT-1 and PEPT1) (P < 0.05).

conclusionsIn conclusion, these findings indicate that dietary COS improves growth performance in EHEC-challenged weaned pigs, with enhanced intestinal barrier integrity and nutrient transport capacity.

Indexed as

ChitosanEscherichia coli InfectionsSwine DiseasesAnimal FeedAnimalsCytokinesDietDietary SupplementsEnterohemorrhagic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli O157Intestinal Barrier FunctionIntestinal MucosaSwineWeaningChitosanCytokinesAlternative to antimicrobialsChitosanEnterohemorrhagic Escherichia coliInflammationWeaned pigs

Identifiers

PMID42816880
PMCPMC13628782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.