ArticleGenomics & informatics2026
In silico structural and functional characterisation of two hypothetical proteins from the plant‑associated bacterium Kosakonia cowanii F52.
Article in Genomics & informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kosakonia cowanii promotes plant growth under salt stress, but many of its hypothetical proteins (HPs) remain uncharacterised. We screened 218 HPs from K. cowanii F52 using sequential filters for physicochemical stability, subcellular localisation, and conserved domains. Four candidates were modelled with AlphaFold2 and validated by stereochemical and global geometry scores. Two HPs, MHQ1860809.1 and MHQ1862734.1, were selected based on combined global and per-residue model-quality metrics for further functional annotation via structural similarity searches, Gene Ontology (GO), and KEGG pathway analysis. Molecular docking of NAD⁺ was subsequently performed on MHQ1860809.1 to evaluate cofactor binding. MHQ1860809.1 is predicted to adopt a canonical Rossmann fold with a conserved NAD(P)-binding pocket; docking was consistent with NAD⁺ binding (Vina score -7.8 kcal/mol). GO predicted oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016646) and proline metabolic process (GO:0006560). MHQ1862734.1 is predicted to fold into an ARM-repeat superhelix, lacks any ligand-binding cavity, and is structurally similar to importin-β and AP-2 adaptor subunits. However, no EC numbers or KEGG orthologies could be assigned. MHQ1860809.1 is therefore structurally consistent with a putative NAD(P)-dependent oxidoreductase potentially involved in proline biosynthesis, whereas MHQ1862734.1 adopts an ARM-repeat fold of unknown function. These findings generate specific, testable hypotheses and provide a foundation for future experimental work on the molecular basis of K. cowanii plant growth-promoting activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.