ReviewParasites & vectors2026
LeishVet update and current recommendations on feline leishmaniosis.
Review in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2015, the LeishVet group published a comprehensive review on feline leishmaniosis (FeL) caused by Leishmania infantum, highlighting the growing interest in the disease despite the limited availability of evidence-based studies at the time. Over the past decade, considerable advances have been made in various aspects of animal leishmaniosis, including FeL. Veterinary awareness has increased, and diagnostic support is more widely available. However, current knowledge on FeL still largely comes from case reports and small case series studies, with fewer analytical studies and a lower evidence level compared to canine leishmaniosis. In response, the LeishVet group reviewed recent progress and provided updated recommendations based on key international publications, clinical expertise and expert consensus. A series of questions was formulated to address the main aspects of FeL most relevant for veterinary practitioners, including etiology, transmission, epidemiology (including geographical distribution and risk factors), immunology, clinical presentations and clinicopathological findings, the role of coinfections and/or comorbidities, diagnosis, prognosis formulation based on clinical staging, treatment, monitoring and prevention of FeL. The answers are largely supported by visual aids (tables, figures, and algorithms). This updated review paper focuses mainly on L. infantum infection and disease in domestic cats as it is the species of Leishmania most frequently diagnosed in cats. Two specific questions have also been dedicated to infection in wild felids and Leishmania spp. other than L. infantum, for supporting veterinary specialists in wildlife and zoo medicine and taking in consideration that globalization opens new challenges to practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.