ReviewUpdates in surgery2026
Use of the periprosthetic capsule in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: literature review and practical applications.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periprosthetic capsule formation is an inevitable consequence of implant-based breast surgery and has traditionally been regarded as an undesirable outcome because of its association with capsular contracture. Nevertheless, growing surgical experience has highlighted that this biologically active, vascularised, and mechanically resistant tissue may represent a valuable autologous resource in selected reconstructive and aesthetic procedures. This narrative review provides an updated overview of the current literature, summarising the biological rationale for capsule reuse, its surgical applications, potential benefits, and the limitations of the available evidence. Published reports describe the use of the periprosthetic capsule as either a pedicled flap or a free graft in a variety of clinical settings, including implant salvage, pocket reinforcement, correction of implant malposition, inframammary fold reconstruction, management of rippling and contour deformities, and lower pole support. Overall, the available literature suggests that capsule reuse may provide reliable structural support and soft-tissue coverage while reducing the need for heterologous materials or donor-site morbidity in carefully selected patients. No oncologically relevant adverse events directly attributable to capsule reuse have been reported in the published literature to date, although the available evidence remains limited. This review aims to provide surgeons with a practical and comprehensive overview of the current indications, technical considerations, and potential applications of periprosthetic capsule reuse in breast surgery. However, the evidence is based predominantly on case reports and small case series, with heterogeneous indications, surgical techniques, and follow-up. Consequently, definitive conclusions regarding long-term safety and effectiveness cannot yet be drawn, highlighting the need for larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42816739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.