ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Quality-by-design Driven Formulation Development of Propellent Free Foam Formulation for Effective Burn-related Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Preclinical Study.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn wound infections remain a major clinical challenge due to extensive tissue damage, delayed healing, and increased susceptibility to microbial contamination, which can limit the effectiveness of conventional topical formulations. This study aimed to develop and optimize a Quality-by-Design (QbD)-based non-propellant foam (NPF) containing silver nitrate, chlorhexidine, and asiaticoside for enhanced burn wound management. A sequential design of experiments strategy was employed, involving Taguchi L8 screening followed by Box-Behnken optimization to identify the critical formulation variables influencing foam performance and drug release. The optimized formulation exhibited desirable physicochemical characteristics, including a foam density of 0.192 ± 0.002 g/mL, a skin-compatible pH of 5.56 ± 0.04, uniform drug content (98-99%), and satisfactory foam stability. In-vitro studies demonstrated cumulative drug release of 94.69% chlorhexidine, 82.13% asiaticoside, and 78.63% silver nitrate within 6 h, with the release profiles predominantly following the Higuchi diffusion model. Accelerated stability studies indicated that the formulation remained stable over six months. In a Sprague-Dawley rat burn wound model, the optimized foam achieved 93.29 ± 1.75% wound contraction by day 14, outperforming both the untreated control and the marketed formulation. Furthermore, biochemical analyses revealed increased hydroxyproline, hexosamine, and hexuronic acid levels, while histopathological examination confirmed enhanced collagen deposition, neovascularization, and re-epithelialization. These findings demonstrate that the developed QbD-based non-propellant foam represents a promising preclinical topical delivery platform capable of supporting both antimicrobial protection and tissue repair during burn wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42816737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.