ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Learning how: A "mindless" procedure alone gives rise to contextual cueing-A weakly supervised connectionist model of statistical context learning in visual search.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because our environment is not random, it is beneficial to assimilate the statistics of sensory impressions and improve performance, such as visual search for a target object in a cluttered array of nontarget objects (contextual cueing [CC] effect). Computational models of CC have so far focused on predicting the target location from a particular configuration of nontarget items. This contrasts with recent findings according to which display repetitions train human participants' general procedures for the search task. Here, we test the latter idea by employing a connectionist model of visual search that exclusively learns a search procedure without acquiring any individual display-layout information. We show that an instance of a "learning how" mechanism not only proposes a viable alternative account to existing "learning that" mechanisms, but also generates more plausible key behavioral metrics and exhibits a central bias as an emergent phenomenon of learning-induced plasticity. These findings have implications for models of visual search and artificial intelligence: Learning a procedure from leveraging a task's structure alone can mimic the effects of top-down modulation of attention while also reducing the need for supervision in learning, thereby making computational models that leverage procedural learning behaviorally more plausible and easier to train.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.