Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816706›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Quantifying infants' everyday restrained experiences in the home using wearable inertial sensors.

Hanzhi Wang, Hailey N Rousey, John M Franchak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanzhi WangDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0520-5935
Hailey N RouseyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9828-0693
John M FranchakDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA. franchak@ucr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-2864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical restraint-including being held, carried, and restrained in devices-is a common feature of infants' everyday lives. However, previous survey-based and video-based methods cannot simultaneously provide continuous, full-day accounts of infants' restrained experiences. This study developed and validated a machine learning model to quantify infants' restrained time moment-to-moment across the full day in the home environment using wearable sensor data. We used a dataset that includes 146 home-visit sessions from 66 infants, with 30 younger infants aged 4-7 months, and 36 older infants aged 11-14 months. We annotated infants' restrained states in the first 1.5-h video recording of each session as ground-truth labels. The supervised machine-learning model achieved high accuracy (89%) and substantial kappa agreement (κ = .73) compared with human-coded ground truth. The model showed a slight bias toward overestimating unrestrained periods relative to restrained periods, but this bias was mitigated when we used a longer data-aggregation window. The model also showed convergent validity by corroborating prior studies that showed an age-related decrease in infants' overall restrained time throughout the day. In short, the current study demonstrated the utility of using wearable sensors to quantify infants' real-world restrained experiences, offering a new tool for studying how daily restraint influences early development.

Indexed as

Infant BehaviorRestraint, PhysicalWearable Electronic DevicesFemaleHumansInfantMachine LearningMaleVideo RecordingEveryday experiencesInfantMachine learningRestraintWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID42816706
PMCPMC13627237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.