ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Quantifying infants' everyday restrained experiences in the home using wearable inertial sensors.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical restraint-including being held, carried, and restrained in devices-is a common feature of infants' everyday lives. However, previous survey-based and video-based methods cannot simultaneously provide continuous, full-day accounts of infants' restrained experiences. This study developed and validated a machine learning model to quantify infants' restrained time moment-to-moment across the full day in the home environment using wearable sensor data. We used a dataset that includes 146 home-visit sessions from 66 infants, with 30 younger infants aged 4-7 months, and 36 older infants aged 11-14 months. We annotated infants' restrained states in the first 1.5-h video recording of each session as ground-truth labels. The supervised machine-learning model achieved high accuracy (89%) and substantial kappa agreement (κ = .73) compared with human-coded ground truth. The model showed a slight bias toward overestimating unrestrained periods relative to restrained periods, but this bias was mitigated when we used a longer data-aggregation window. The model also showed convergent validity by corroborating prior studies that showed an age-related decrease in infants' overall restrained time throughout the day. In short, the current study demonstrated the utility of using wearable sensors to quantify infants' real-world restrained experiences, offering a new tool for studying how daily restraint influences early development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.