ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2026
Evaluating Human Auditory Nerve (AN) and Brainstem Function Through Level-Dependent Chirps and Predicted AN Firing Distributions.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The amplitudes of the human compound action potential (CAP) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) are influenced by the cochlear traveling wave. To synchronize auditory nerve (AN) firing, short, rising-frequency chirps have been used to compensate for traveling wave delays; however, for high presentation levels, basal spread of excitation may disrupt AN synchrony. Further, unintended spread of excitation over the time course of the chirp may adapt basal AN fibers, thereby reducing CAP and ABR amplitudes-opposite of the objective of using chirps. Previous work has altered the rate of frequency change as a function of chirp level to maximize AN synchrony. Here, we evaluated, in normal-hearing adults (N = 12, six males), an alternative approach of attenuating low-frequency chirp energy and hypothesized this manipulation would increase CAP and ABR amplitudes relative to the original, flat-spectrum chirp for high stimulus levels. Low-frequency-attenuated chirps produced larger CAP and ABR wave amplitudes than clicks and the original chirp for nearly all stimulus levels. To explore mechanisms underlying these results, we derived AN firing distributions for chirps and clicks. The distributions for low-frequency-attenuated chirps were consistent with greater AN synchrony compared to those for clicks and the original chirp. ABR waveforms were reasonably simulated by convolving the derived AN firing distributions with an impulse response waveform associated with the ABR electrode montage. These findings suggest that low-frequency-attenuated chirps and predicted AN firing distributions may be useful in evaluating human AN function, including the effects of AN fiber loss, and other disease states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42816694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.