ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
In silico designing of small molecules for targeting RNA: current landscape and future directions.
Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA molecules govern nearly every layer of cellular regulation, yet they have long remained an underexploited target for small-molecule drug discovery relative to proteins. The 2020 FDA approval of risdiplam, the first small molecule to directly correct pre-mRNA splicing, demonstrated that folded RNAs can present druggable pockets and renewed interest in the field. However, fully exploiting the therapeutic potential of RNA depends on the development of computational methods capable of addressing (or utilizing or harnessing) the unique physicochemical characteristics of RNA It includes conformationally dynamic backbone, featureless binding surfaces, and the limited availability of high-resolution RNA-ligand co-crystal structures. This review surveys the computational pipeline built around these constraints, covering binding-site prediction (from early network-based tools to RNA language models such as RLsite and RNABind), RNA-specific docking and scoring functions (SPRank, RLDOCKScore, RNAmigos2), structure-based design (SILCS-RNA), fragment-based approaches guided by NMR screening, sequence-based platforms (Inforna), molecular dynamics and free-energy methods, and deep-learning affinity predictors (DeepRSMA, RLASIF, SMRTnet, PRISM). It concludes by examining the field's persistent constraints, including lack of structural data, underdeveloped force fields, unresolved selectivity, and the gap between in silico and cellular activity, and the advances likely to narrow them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42816656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.