ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Carnivore scavenging patterns in terrestrial contexts: a 25-year retrospective study of forensic anthropology cases from Greece.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal scavenging is frequently encountered in forensic investigations. The identification of scavenging is crucial, as scavengers have the potential to disrupt forensic contexts significantly by disarticulating body elements and consuming portions of bone. Determining the anatomical areas more commonly affected by scavengers can assist in recognizing the presence of scavenging activity in forensic contexts. Past forensic cases, submitted to the Forensic Anthropology Unit of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School for analysis between 1999 and 2023, were analyzed. Of the 256 cases examined, 62 exhibited signs of carnivore scavenging, while 194 presented no such evidence. To evaluate the impact of scavenging on human decomposition, the data collected from these cases were analyzed and compared. This comparison aimed to identify and assess any statistically significant differences in preservation and environmental conditions between scavenged and non-scavenged remains. The results indicate that scavenging is more likely to occur in rural settings and areas characterized by low population density. A lower prevalence of upper limb bones was reported in cases exhibiting signs of scavenging. Furthermore, this study identified specific anatomical regions that are preferentially affected by scavenger activity. Given the relative scarcity of similar research in Europe, the present study provides valuable insights into scavenging patterns in Greece and the broader European context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42816646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.