ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Perioperative and functional outcomes of the deloyers procedure compared to other reconstructive options after extended left or subtotal colectomy: a systematic review.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter major left-sided colonic resections, achieving a tension-free anastomosis while preserving bowel continuity can be technically demanding, historically leading many surgeons to choose a permanent ostomy. The Deloyers procedure offers a reconstructive alternative that avoids a permanent stoma and preserves the right colon's absorptive function.
objectiveTo evaluate perioperative and functional outcomes of the Deloyers procedure compared to other reconstructive options, following extended left or subtotal colectomy, informing surgical planning for bowel continuity restoration. MATERIALS AND
methodsOf the 220 studies initially identified, 18 comprising 283 cases met the inclusion criteria. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Patient demographics and outcomes were independently extracted from the studies by 3 researchers, compared, and discussed to a consensus. Risk of bias and the quality of the methodology were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools.
resultsOur systematic review yielded 283 patients overall from the 18 studies. Thirteen reported outcomes of the Deloyers procedure only, while 5 reported comparative outcomes of the Deloyers procedure to other anastomotic techniques, such as ileorectal anastomosis (2, 17), trans-mesenteric anastomosis (8, 10), and complete intestinal rotation (11). Most studies were from Europe and Asia. Most procedures were open (82%); the most common indication was colon cancer (39%). Reported late complications included surgical site infection (n=10, 3.5%), post-operative ileus (n=13, 4.6%), anastomotic leak (n=10, 3.5%), anastomotic stricture/stenosis (n=9, 3.2%), and incisional hernia (n=11, 3.9%). Long-term functional outcomes were reported in 14 of 18 studies (78%), with a consistent median of 2-3 daily bowel movements at final follow-up. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 120 months.
conclusionThe Deloyers procedure is a valuable and safe option for re-establishing bowel continuity after major colonic resections, with outcomes comparable to those of other types of anastomoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42816637What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.