ReviewNature2026
Written in development and lost in ageing: the grammar of cellular identity.
Review in Nature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ageing has been described through many theoretical frameworks, yet its mechanistic basis remains unresolved. Here we propose that ageing reflects progressive decanalization of mammalian cell identity, driven by erosion of a regulatory grammar written during development. Extending Waddington's epigenetic landscape, development canalizes cell fates through globally coordinated chromatin programs that establish identity constraints across multiple timescales. Subsequently, these constraints can only be maintained through local mechanisms with limited fidelity. The asymmetry between high-fidelity writing and imperfect maintenance generates predictable drift that accumulates with biological time. Antagonistic chromatin pathways, particularly polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2)-mediated repression opposed by H3K4/36 methylation and RNA polymerase II binding, enforce identity boundaries through mutual constraint. With age, this balance erodes. Consistent with this framework, the vast majority of age-associated DNA methylation gain in somatic mitotic tissues occurs at PRC2-bound low-methylated regions, indicating that these domains function as conserved coordinates of slow-layer drift. This model explains cross-tissue ageing signatures, developmental timing-to-lifespan correlations and robustness of pan-mammalian epigenetic ageing clocks. It provides testable predictions for interventions that stabilize architecture to preserve cellular identity and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42816559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.