ArticleNature neuroscience2026
A population code for semantics in human hippocampus.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivated by the successes of large language models (LLMs), we hypothesized that semantic information in the brain may be expressed in distributed patterns of neural activity. We recorded responses of hippocampal neurons while individuals listened to narrative speech. Here, using an encoding model approach, we find robust encoding of semantics, even after controlling for phonemics and grammar. Individual words had complex selectivities that included multiple words in multiple semantic categories. Similar to embedding vectors in LLMs, distance between neural population responses correlated with semantic distance. For semantically similar words, even contextual embedders showed an inverse correlation between semantic and neural distances; we attribute this pattern to the noise-mitigating benefits of contrastive coding. Finally, neural population activity aligned most closely with GPT-2 embeddings, and variation in response patterns correlated with LLM-derived polysemy measures, indicating that semantic encoding is largely contextualized. Ultimately, these results provide a neurocomputational account for understanding how hippocampal neurons encode word meaning during language listening.
Identifiers
42816555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.