Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816537›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A genus-labeled dataset of individual trees outside forests in Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Yulia Grinblat, Heike Tost, Anastasia Benedyk, Andreas Meyer Lindenberg, Somidh Saha, Alexander Zipf, Nir Fulman

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yulia Grinblat *Heidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology: HeiGIT, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heike TostDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Anastasia BenedykDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas Meyer LindenbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Somidh SahaResearch Group Sylvanus, Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6518-7476
Alexander ZipfHeidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology: HeiGIT, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-9838
Nir Fulman *Heidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology: HeiGIT, Heidelberg, Germany. nir.fulman@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-2641

Funding

Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt 033L310DDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 35/1597-1 FUGG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed data on individual trees growing outside forests (TOF) are essential for arboriculture, biodiversity assessment, ecosystem services assessment, climate adaptation, and environmental health research. However, existing datasets are often incomplete and seldom provide taxonomic information beyond publicly managed trees in cities of Germany and other countries where maintaining a tree cadaster is a legal requirement. Here, we present for the first time a statewide dataset of individual TOF in the state of Baden-Württemberg, Germany, including tree locations, crown geometry, height, and genus-level labels. We mapped trees from high-resolution multi-spectral aerial imagery and height data using deep learning, with terrestrial LiDAR surveys used to create training labels within the URBORETUM project. The released dataset includes ten genus-level classes, including the aggregate categories "Other Deciduous" and "Coniferous" where assignment from aerial imagery is uncertain. The final ten-class genus model achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.382 at an intersection-over-union (IoU) threshold of 0.5 (mAP@0.5) and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.627 for taxonomic class assignment, while a separately trained one-class tree detector achieved an mAP@0.5 of 0.647, indicating stronger reliability for crown detection than for taxonomic classification. The final inventory contains 16.3 million predicted trees across the mapped non-forest domain of Baden-Württemberg. Beyond providing a statewide dataset, this work offers a scalable vision and operational blueprint for an evolving tree inventory that can be systematically improved over time through better imagery, richer local reference data, and targeted retraining.

Indexed as

TreesDeep LearningForestsGermany

Identifiers

PMID42816537
PMCPMC13627677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.