Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816515›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Handling biological replicates in long-read RNA sequencing data by joining or not joining.

Fabian Jetzinger, Alejandro Paniagua, Stanley Cormack, Jorge Mestre-Tomás, José Manuel Morante-Redolat, Isabel Fariñas, Luis Ferrández-Peral, Stefan Götz, Carolina Monzó, Ana Conesa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabian JetzingerBioBam Bioinformatics S.L., Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-3150-2167
Alejandro PaniaguaInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Paterna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0566-8830
Stanley CormackInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Paterna, Spain.
Jorge Mestre-TomásInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Paterna, Spain.
José Manuel Morante-RedolatNetwork for Biomedical Research Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain.
Isabel FariñasNetwork for Biomedical Research Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2903-4960
Luis Ferrández-PeralInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Paterna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0338-0603
Stefan GötzBioBam Bioinformatics S.L., Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5777-3520
Carolina MonzóInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Paterna, Spain. carolina.monzo@csic.es.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-8145
Ana ConesaInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Paterna, Spain. ana.conesa@csic.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9597-311X

Funding

Development of methods for transcript quantification anddifferential expression analysis using long-read sequencing technologiesR21HG011280 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CONESA CEGARRA, ANA VICTORIA · 2020 to 2020
$307k
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101072892EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101149931NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG011280U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) 1R21HG011280-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While isoform identification from long-read RNA sequencing (lrRNA-seq) data has received significant attention, the handling of biologically replicated lrRNA-seq datasets remains less explored. This study defines two strategies for obtaining consensus transcriptomes from multi-sample lrRNA-seq data: Join & Call, where reads from all samples are combined before transcript reconstruction, and Call & Join, where transcript reconstruction is performed on individual samples before combining the resulting annotations. We apply these strategies to mouse brain and kidney tissue datasets, using PacBio and ONT technologies, across six transcript reconstruction tools. Our results indicate that the optimal strategy depends on the tool and research objective. We find that Join & Call is generally preferable for discovering novel isoforms, while Call & Join is often preferable for highly replicated datasets when the discovery of novelty is secondary. Our findings provide a conceptual and practical framework for multi-sample transcript reconstruction, guiding best practices for increasingly large-scale lrRNA-seq studies.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNAAnimalsBrainGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingKidneyMiceRNA-SeqSoftwareTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID42816515
PMCPMC13627694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.