ArticleNature communications2026
Handling biological replicates in long-read RNA sequencing data by joining or not joining.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While isoform identification from long-read RNA sequencing (lrRNA-seq) data has received significant attention, the handling of biologically replicated lrRNA-seq datasets remains less explored. This study defines two strategies for obtaining consensus transcriptomes from multi-sample lrRNA-seq data: Join & Call, where reads from all samples are combined before transcript reconstruction, and Call & Join, where transcript reconstruction is performed on individual samples before combining the resulting annotations. We apply these strategies to mouse brain and kidney tissue datasets, using PacBio and ONT technologies, across six transcript reconstruction tools. Our results indicate that the optimal strategy depends on the tool and research objective. We find that Join & Call is generally preferable for discovering novel isoforms, while Call & Join is often preferable for highly replicated datasets when the discovery of novelty is secondary. Our findings provide a conceptual and practical framework for multi-sample transcript reconstruction, guiding best practices for increasingly large-scale lrRNA-seq studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.