ArticleNature communications2026
ERα Micromap (µMap) proximity labeling reveals fulvestrant mechanisms.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estrogen Receptor alpha (ERα) is the primary driver in ER+ breast cancer and can be targeted using small molecules such as fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD). Despite being approved over two decades ago and used regularly in post-menopausal women, its precise anti-tumor mechanism remains unclear, with several reports showing efficacy without the requirement for ERα degradation. To investigate the molecular basis of fulvestrant's action, we employed split intein-based µMap photo-proximity labeling to profile ERα-associated interactions. Our findings reveal that fulvestrant displaces oncogenic interactions induced by estradiol and promotes ERα translocation to promyelocytic leukemia (PML) nuclear bodies, leading to altered transcriptional signatures and senescence. Overall, this study offers insights into SERD mechanism of action and establishes a framework for evaluating additional ERα modulators and degraders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.