ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
Robust structural superlubric interfaces under high current density, from understandings to applications.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural superlubricity (SSL) exhibits significant potential for applications in micro/nanoelectromechanical systems, switches, and sensors, owing to its characteristics of near-zero friction and zero wear. However, the deployment of the more universal 2D/3D SSL interfaces in efficient electronics is severely limited by an insufficient understanding of their electrical stability and failure mechanisms under high current density. In contrast to the Joule-heating-induced interlayer bonding that limits the critical current density in 2D/2D SSL interfaces, we report a fundamentally different failure mechanism for 2D/3D SSL interfaces under high current density: the interfacial Au layer melts and transitions from single-crystalline to polycrystalline state, which drastically increases surface roughness and thus causes a friction surge, severe graphite wear, and the eventual collapse of the SSL state. Notably, under this new failure mechanism, the critical current density of the interface increases by nearly an order of magnitude compared to that of 2D/2D SSL interfaces, exceeding 110 GA/m². Furthermore, we developed a high-power switch prototype that significantly outperforms conventional ones, demonstrating a critical step in translating SSL from principle to practice and paving the way for addressing contact issues in high-power, long-life electronics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.