ArticleNature communications2026
Hydrogen-helium immiscibility boundary in gas-giant planetary interiors from machine-learning molecular dynamics.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The location of the hydrogen-helium (H/He) immiscibility boundary controls whether and where helium rain occurs in giant planets, yet it remains uncertain because high-pressure experiments are challenging and ab initio simulations are limited in system size and simulation time. We map this boundary by computing composition-dependent chemical potentials from large-scale molecular dynamics driven by machine learning potentials trained on three density functional approximations (PBE, vdW-DF, and the hybrid HSE). Across the pressure range of 100-1000 GPa, the demixing temperatures are typically ~ 2000 K lower than previous ab initio simulations using small system sizes, and this discrepancy is larger than the estimated error from the chosen density functionals, machine learning potentials, neglect of nuclear quantum effects, and statistical uncertainties. Fitting the H/He mixing free energy to a Redlich-Kister regular solution model rationalizes the thermodynamic driving force for phase separation, and provides a predictive representation of the boundary. Comparing with current planetary interior profiles indicates that helium rain is plausible in Saturn but unlikely in the warmer interior of Jupiter. Our results narrow the uncertainty in the H/He immiscibility boundary and provide inputs for planetary models that couple demixing, heat transport, and composition gradients in gas giants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.