ArticleBDJ open2026
Developing a peer-led approach to assess the oral health needs and experiences of people in prison and on release.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study used a participatory research approach to develop population-specific oral health questionnaires and a peer-researcher model to explore the oral health needs and experiences of people in prison and after their release.
methodsA two-phase co-design approach using the Double Diamond framework engaged people with lived experience of prison, dental professionals, and support workers. Phase one involved collaborative workshops to design two questionnaires: one for use in prison and one following release. A peer-researcher model was also co-designed. Phase two piloted the questionnaires and peer-researcher model with people who had previously been in prison.
resultsThe questionnaire development process indicated that population specific questionnaires, rather than generic oral health questionnaires, were required to capture the distinct experiences of people in prison and following release. This included broader impacts of poor oral health, such as reduced self-esteem, barriers to employment, and substance use to manage dental pain. The peer-researcher model was deemed essential by the engagement group to improve uptake of the questionnaires through building trust. This model also enabled dialogue facilitated by peer-researchers that supported risk reduction (e.g. tobacco use), health education, and signposting to support services.
conclusionsA co-design approach enabled the development of population-specific oral health questionnaires and a peer-researcher model. These tools can be used in future studies to collect oral health data and support positive changes in both oral and general health behaviours.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.