ArticleNature communications2026
The global distribution of macroalgal carbon burial in coastal sediments.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macroalgae play a pivotal role in the global ocean carbon cycle, yet the spatial distribution of their coastal carbon burial, a long-term sink relevant to national inventories, remains poorly resolved. Here, we present a high-resolution (5-arcminute, ~9.2 km at the equator) global assessment of the Macroalgal Carbon Burial Index (MCBI), a measure of how favorable coastal environments are for burying macroalgal carbon. Synthesizing the most comprehensive dataset of sediment accumulation rates (n = 1617), we identify the depositional environment as a critical constraint on burial, acting independently of macroalgal productivity. High-favorability sinks are geographically rare (<1% of global coastlines), clustering in regions such as the Korea Bay and Okhotsk-Sakhalin region. We further identify coastline complexity as an informative predictor of MCBI (R² = 0.59), enabling low-cost identification of burial hotspots. Notably, we identify a mismatch in conservation: existing marine protected areas cover 23.9% of low-burial coastlines but only 17.1% of primary burial hotspots. Our findings map the global pattern of macroalgal carbon burial and provide a spatially explicit basis for its integration into conservation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.