ArticleCancer science2026
Phase II Study of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Plus Necitumumab for Squamous NSCLC After ICI-Platinum Therapy (WJOG14120L).
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment options remain limited for unresectable or advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC) that progresses after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. Although combination therapy with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and necitumumab (CGN) represents a potential second-line regimen, no prospective data in a post-ICI setting have been reported. This open-label, multicenter single-arm Phase II study enrolled patients with LSqCC after platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICI, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with the null and alternative hypotheses set at 23% and 40%, respectively. Secondary endpoints included the disease-control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the impact of platinum-free interval (PFI), eligibility for anti-angiogenic therapies, and safety. Forty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy. ORR was 26.1% (80% CI, 17.7-36.2) and DCR was 87.0% (95% CI, 73.7-95.1). Median PFS and OS were 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.5) and 12.2 months (95% CI, 9.4-15.2), respectively. Common adverse events included hematological toxicities, acneiform rash, and hypomagnesemia. No pneumonitis or treatment-related deaths were observed. The safety profile was consistent across prior treatment types and anti-angiogenic therapies eligibility. PFI analysis showed that longer PFI durations were associated with improvements in PFS and OS, and the optimal PFI cutoff value was approximately 4 months. Although the predefined response threshold was not met, CGN demonstrated modest antitumor activity with a high DCR and a manageable toxicity after ICI-based therapy. CGN may be a feasible treatment option for second-line after ICI-based therapy, including for patients unsuitable for anti-angiogenic therapies, although further validation is warranted. Trial Registration: jRCTs051200138.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.