Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42816147›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2026

Assessing the Use of Oxford Nanopore Technologies Sequencing for Detection of Stable Wolbachia Bacterial Strain in Symbiosis in Wild Anopheles Mosquitoes From the WHO African Region.

Laura Chatterley, Nicola Hull, Isabel Hughes, Seynabou Sougoufara, Owain Meek, Murat Ceyran, Vishaal Dhokiya, Janvier Bandibabone, Cyprian Adala, Elin Cunningham and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Laura ChatterleySchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3625-0755
Nicola HullSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Isabel HughesSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0720-1951
Seynabou SougoufaraSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Owain MeekSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Murat CeyranSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Vishaal DhokiyaDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7733-1356
Janvier BandibaboneLaboratoire D'entomologie médicale et Parasitologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles (CRSN/LWIRO), Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8218-8614
Cyprian AdalaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Bondo, Kenya.
Elin CunninghamSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4896-6869
Shehu Shagari AwanduDepartment of Biological Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Bondo, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6265-9842
Helene Kaminski-NenkamLaboratoire de Recherche sur le Paludisme, Organisation de Coordination Pour la Lutte Contre Les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Antonio NkondjioLaboratoire de Recherche sur le Paludisme, Organisation de Coordination Pour la Lutte Contre Les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0073-1578
Grant L HughesDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7567-7185
Eva HeinzStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-3756
Thomas WalkerSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-012X

Funding

African Research Excellence Fund AREF-312-AWAN-F-C0906African Research Excellence Fund AREF-312-AWAN-S-C1027Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-048598Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V011278/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V011278/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W018446/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X018024/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UKRI543:2023BBSRC-NSF/BIONational Health and Medical Research Council 2038930National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR2000907Open Philanthropy via Anti-VecSir Henry Dale Wellcome Trust Royal Society Fellowship 101285/Z/13/ZUK Research and Innovation 20197Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria remains a significant global health challenge with 263 million cases in 2023. Anopheles insecticide resistance threatens current vector control methods, and novel strategies are crucial to combat malaria transmission. Wolbachia, an endosymbiotic bacteria that can invade mosquito populations and inhibit pathogen replication, has only recently been shown as a high-density symbiont in two wild Anopheles species. Detection of Wolbachia in symbiosis with Anopheles mosquitoes has relied on PCR amplification of Wolbachia genes and/or Sanger and Illumina sequencing. This study assesses Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) to detect Wolbachia, which could facilitate screening for symbiosis with wild Anopheles mosquitoes in endemic settings. We used 46 samples; 10 were pooled for a single MinION flow cell run and the rest processed individually using Flongle flow cells, comparing three mosquito species with three kit combinations. Using the ONT Field sequencing kit, there were 13X more Wolbachia reads in An. demeilloni (genuine symbiosis) than An. gambiae (no evidence of Wolbachia). The ONT 16S barcoding kit and Rapid barcoding kit were then assessed using more economical Flongle flow cells. Wolbachia was successfully identified in An. demeilloni and An. moucheti but not in An. gambiae. This study demonstrates the feasibility of ONT for field-based detection of Wolbachia.

Indexed as

AnophelesNanopore SequencingSymbiosisWolbachiaAnimalsAnopheles mosquitoesFlonglemalariaMinIONnanopore sequencingOxford nanopore technologies (ONT)Wolbachia

Identifiers

PMID42816147
PMCPMC13626860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.