ArticleBMJ open2026
Impacts of long-term climate change on human health: a global scoping review of quantitative research.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesResearch output on the impacts of climate change and human health is growing rapidly. We aimed to synthesise peer-reviewed studies on this subject published between January 2000 and May 2024.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Literature was collected from PubMed, Embase and Scopus on 11 November 2019, 25 June 2021 and 22 April 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included English language quantitative peer-reviewed primary research articles about the impacts of long-term climate change (ie, as opposed to effects of weather or single climatic events with the exception of attribution studies) on human health. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Full-texts were screened by single reviewers, although 23% of publications selected for full-text screening received an independent second-screening. Reported exposures and health outcomes were classified. Reported quantitative effects of long-term climate change on human health were coded as increasing, decreasing, variable or non-significant.
resultsFrom 60 781 initial records we included 1223 quantitative publications in this scoping review. Health impacts of long-term climate change were studied most often in Europe, the Americas and the Western Pacific. Studies on temperature and on disease vectors, including the diseases they transmit, represented 39.3% and 30.9% of all included publications, respectively. Included results covered over 100 specific health outcomes. Diarrhoeal diseases, malaria, dengue, ischaemic heart disease and stroke were the most studied specific health outcomes. While infectious diseases were often studied in low- and middle-income countries, non-communicable diseases were rarely examined in this context. About 20% of included publications provided retrospective results, demonstrating that climate change is already impacting human health in variable ways globally. About 80% of included publications provided prospective results, projecting mostly variable or increasing impacts on human health over the coming decades.
conclusionsOur scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of existing evidence about the impacts of long-term climate change on human health. Currently, differences in research methodologies make it difficult to directly compare study findings. The outcomes of this review can help to harmonise future climate change and health research and support evidence-based climate change adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.