ArticleBMJ open2026
Vital@Work reintegration programme for sick-listed workers with stress-related complaints in occupational healthcare in the Netherlands: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06543732 (Vital@Work), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vital@Work: a Personalized Reintegration Program for Employees with Stress-related Complaints
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMental health problems, including stress-related complaints, are an increasing concern in today's workforce. Therefore, long-term sickness absence becomes a risk, yet effective return to work (RTW) interventions for employees suffering from mental health problems are scarce and they lack tailoring. The aim of this study is to describe the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of the tailored Vital@Work reintegration programme for sick-listed workers with stress-related complaints. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An RCT involving 208 sick-listed workers with stress-related complaints will be conducted with measurements taking place at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Stress-related complaints will be assessed with a distress screener. All participants will receive care as usual. The intervention group will receive a tailored eHealth programme, followed by the participatory approach if full RTW has not been achieved after 6 weeks in the study. Participants assigned to the control group will be provided with general information via the eHealth programme. The primary outcome is sustainable RTW, defined as lasting at least 28 consecutive days without any relapse. Secondary outcomes are stress-related complaints, psychosocial job characteristics and behaviour change. A mixed-methods approach will be used for the process evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Amsterdam UMC (approval number: 2024.0021). Results are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals. In addition, interim and final results will be shared and discussed with the participating organisations involved in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06543732.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.