ArticleBMJ global health2026
Care under attack: a qualitative study of healthcare system disruption and health worker resilience during airstrikes on Lebanon.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWar severely disrupts healthcare systems by damaging infrastructure, limiting access to care and placing healthcare workers (HCWs) at physical and psychological risk. During the 2024 Israeli war on Lebanon, repeated airstrikes created major challenges for healthcare delivery. This study explored HCWs' experiences and examined the impact of conflict on healthcare system functioning and service continuity.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 19 HCWs involved in emergency response and patient care, including nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff affected during the conflict. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by a critical health systems framework.
resultsTwo overarching themes emerged: (1) operational disruption and failures in preparedness and accountability and (2) workforce resilience and professional commitment during crisis. Participants described attacks on healthcare facilities, ambulances and infrastructure that disrupted services, caused shortages of staff and medical supplies and reduced access to care. HCWs described a substantial psychological toll, including fear, anxiety, burnout and emotional exhaustion, alongside moral distress arising from having to weigh patient care against their own safety and from being unable to provide the standard of care they were committed to. Despite these conditions, participants demonstrated resilience through teamwork, rapid adaptation and strong professional dedication, helping sustain essential healthcare services during the conflict.
conclusionsThe findings highlight the vulnerability and resilience of healthcare systems in conflict settings, as well as the considerable psychological and moral burden borne by HCWs. Strengthening emergency preparedness, protecting HCWs and facilities and improving accountability for attacks on healthcare are essential to maintaining healthcare delivery and safeguarding workforce well-being during armed conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.