ArticleAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition2026
Construction of risk prediction models for psoriasis based on 45 dietary nutrients using machine learning and SHAP analysis.
Article in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesTo develop and validate a machine learning model to predict the risk of psoriasis based on 45 dietary nutrients. METHODS AND STUDY
design12,749 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2009-2014 were included and their demographic, lifestyle, health status, and dietary nutrient-related information is collected. Imbalanced data were processed using the syn-thetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE). After removing the covariate features, important features were further screened using the Boruta algorithm and six machine learning models were constructed including Random Forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), Kernel K-Nearest Neighbor (K-KNN), L Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The performance of the models was evaluated using benchmarking and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was the main evaluation metric to choose the optimal machine learning model. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were computed to evaluate each feature's prediction role in the mode.
resultsThe Boruta algorithm screened 10 baseline features and 23 dietary nutrient features, and six machine learning models were developed based on them. Compared with other machine learning models, XGBoost demonstrated superior prediction ability. SHAP analysis showed that theobromine, lycopene, caffeine, vitamin D, dietary fiber and vitamin E were the key features that influenced the prediction results.
conclusionsThe machine learning (ML) algorithm constructed a prediction model for psoriasis by incorporating baseline features and dietary nutrient features. The SHAP values indicate the dominant role of dietary nutrients in the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.