ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Development of an Interpretable Triage Tool for Colorectal Polyp Risk Stratification Within a Population-Based Screening Program: Machine Learning Approach.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal polyps are a major source of precancerous lesions in colorectal cancer (CRC). In many population-based screening programs, a major challenge is the efficient triage of high-risk individuals for diagnostic colonoscopy amid limited endoscopic resources. Objective: To enrich current screening frameworks, we aimed to develop an accessible, noninvasive risk stratification tool to serve as a digital triage mechanism for colorectal polyps using machine learning (ML) and routinely collected data in China. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in Wenzhou, China. A total of 4108 individuals (aged 50-74 y) who were referred for and accepted colonoscopy following an initial population-based risk assessment (questionnaire and fecal test) between May and November 2021 were included. The dataset was split into training and validation sets, and the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was applied only to the training dataset to address class imbalance. Twenty-one noninvasive predictors (lifestyle, dietary, clinical symptoms, and family history) were selected using the Boruta algorithm and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Nine ML models were evaluated, with the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) used for model interpretability and feature ranking. Results: Among the 9 ML algorithms evaluated, XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting) achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.672, while LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine) was identified as the optimal model for clinical triage due to its superior recall (0.6503), a key metric for minimizing missed lesions in community screenings. SHAP analysis identified current smoking status, sex, and family history of colorectal polyps as the most influential factors. Notably, the model captured significant nonlinear risk thresholds, such as an age of 50 years and a BMI of 25 kg/m Conclusions: This study provides a scalable, interpretable triage tool to complement existing 2-step CRC screening protocols. By leveraging only noninvasive variables, the LightGBM model enables prioritized referral for colonoscopy, offering a resource-efficient strategy to optimize CRC prevention in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.