Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42814926›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology

Causality-Preserving Generative Adversarial Networks for the Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders.

Junhong Ren, Wensheng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junhong RenSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1925-2550
Wensheng ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3604600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain network has proven to be an effective tool for recognising neurological disorders. However, current brain network modelling algorithms often rely on numerous assumptions when evaluating the interaction relationships between brain regions, which are frequently shown to be inaccurate. For instance, some studies assume that interactions among brain regions are linear. Additionally, some research posits that other brain regions do not influence the evaluation outcomes when assessing causal effects among paired brain regions. To address this challenge, we propose an innovative method for modelling brain networks that estimates interaction relationships among brain regions from a causal perspective. Notably, during the evaluation process, this method comprehensively considers all relevant brain regions rather than examining individual relationships in isolation. To validate the efficacy of our approach, we conducted extensive experimental verifications using publicly available datasets. The experimental results indicate that our proposed brain network modelling method not only demonstrates superior performance in the dementia identification task but also successfully identifies several new biomarkers, providing novel perspectives and insights for dementia research.

Indexed as

Generative Adversarial NetworksModels, NeurologicalNervous System DiseasesAlgorithmsBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve Netbiomedical MRIbrain modelscausalityneural nets

Identifiers

PMID42814926
PMCPMC13626661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.