ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Leveraging Generative Large Language Models for Temporal Relation Extraction From French Clinical Narratives: Prompt-Chaining Approach.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Temporal relation extraction (TRE) in clinical narratives is crucial for understanding patient history, disease progression, and treatment pathways. However, it remains challenging due to limited annotated data and to the complexity of clinical text, including domain-specific terminology, inconsistent information, and implicit temporal reasoning. These challenges are particularly acute for rare diseases, where information such as the date of diagnosis or the onset of key phenotypes is rarely available in structured data, despite being essential for estimating diagnostic delay and reconstructing the natural history of the disease. Objective: We explore the potential of open-weight and on-premises large language models (LLMs) on clinical TRE and normalization using zero- and few-shot prompting, aiming to reduce the time-consuming and costly annotation process. Based on recent promising capabilities of LLMs in understanding and reasoning over text, we evaluate whether these models can efficiently perform TRE and normalization in real-world clinical settings. Methods: We cast the temporal relation task as a question-answering task, in which the models extract the temporal expressions associated with a given clinical event. We propose a prompt-chaining strategy that sequentially performs normalization on the extracted temporal expressions. Our LLM-based approach is evaluated on constructed and annotated French real-world clinical narratives, covering temporal relations involving 2 types of clinical events: phenotypes and rare disease diagnoses. Four open-weight LLMs were evaluated across multiple prompt configurations and compared with rule-based and neural baselines using exact-match metrics, an LLM-as-a-judge evaluation, and human validation. We further evaluate our approach by applying it to the English 2012 i2b2 corpus, involving other types of clinical events. Results: The proposed approach achieves stable extraction performance with only a small number of in-context examples across both clinical event types, reaching a maximum Conclusions: Prompting LLMs with a minimal set of in-context examples can achieve strong performance for TRE and normalization in low-resource settings with limited domain-specific annotations. Relying on open-weight, on-premises models, the proposed approach therefore offers a practical path toward deployment in real-world clinical workflows and could further be extended to extract key clinical information, such as age at diagnosis or age at onset, particularly in the context of rare diseases, where it could help prefill structured reporting forms, reducing the manual effort needed to retrieve such information directly from clinical narratives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.