Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42814782›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2026

The association between disability and mortality among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maureen Moyo-Chilufya, Arthemon Nguweneza, Sara Rotenberg, Hannah Kuper, Tracey Smythe

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maureen Moyo-ChilufyaDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-0972
Arthemon NguwenezaDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sara RotenbergDepartment of Population Health, International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6164-8877
Hannah KuperDepartment of Population Health, International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-0023
Tracey SmytheDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-7362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMortality is a fundamental marker of population health and equity. Despite major global declines in mortality over recent decades, disparities in survival persist across childhood and adolescence, particularly by disability status. We aimed to synthesise current evidence on all-cause mortality among children and adolescents with disabilities compared to their non-disabled peers through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND

findingsThis review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251072039). We searched Embase, Global Health, MEDLINE, PubMed and PsycInfo to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 2000 to August 20, 2026. We included cohort studies that compared all-cause mortality rates for children and adolescents with and without disabilities (aged 0-19 years). We excluded studies without a clear definition of disability, disaggregated mortality data, or a control group. Two authors independently screened studies, with data extraction by one and verification by a second. We assessed risk of bias using a Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. We conducted meta-analyses in RevMan for studies reporting age-sex-adjusted or multivariable-adjusted mortality ratios and R software to assess for publication bias. We reported heterogeneity using the I2 and τ2 statistics. We identified 12,664 records of which 29 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing over 35 million children/adolescents. Sixteen studies were eligible to be included in the meta-analysis. Overall, children with disabilities had a 5.31-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) [3.63,7.77]; p < 0.001; τ2 = 0.88; I2 = 98%) higher all-cause mortality than their peers. The association between disability and mortality was higher in both younger children 0-5 years (Hazard ratio (HR)=7.51: 95%CI [4.70,12.00]; p < 0.001; τ2 = 0.44; I2 = 91%) and children 6-19 years (HR = 4.68: 95%CI [2.26,9.69]; p < 0.001; τ2 = 0.93; I2 = 96%). The association varied by disability type and was most stark for children with neurological disabilities (HR = 11.71: 95%CI [7.90,17.35]; p < 0.001; τ2 = 0.19; I2 = 76%). Interpretation is limited by substantial between-study heterogeneity, differences in methods used to ascertain disability ascertainment and in the effect measures used, and the small number of studies from low-income and middle-income countries.

conclusionsChildren with disabilities experience substantially higher mortality than their peers without disabilities. There is an urgent need for evidence on what works to close the mortality gap.

Indexed as

Children with DisabilitiesAdolescentCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID42814782
PMCPMC13641705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.