ArticlePloS one2026
Examining the relationship between temperature and firearm violence: A comparison of metrics.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine and compare the predictive capacities of four temperature metrics on firearm violence: daily maximum temperature, daily apparent maximum temperature, daily deviation from normal temperature, and consecutive days of high heat.
methodWe analyzed daily firearm violence incidents in Syracuse, New York from 2010-2022 using Generalized Linear Autoregressive Moving Average models. Daily maximum temperature, and daily deviation from normal temperature were directly obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Daily apparent maximum temperature was created by combining daily maximum temperature with humidity data derived from windchill and heat index calculations. Consecutive days of high heat was calculated using daily maximum temperature and counting the number of successive days above 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32.2 degrees Celsius). We examined both univariate models for each temperature metric and multivariate models containing multiple temperature variables simultaneously.
resultsOver the 12-year period, Syracuse averaged nearly two firearm violence incidents per day. In univariate analyses, all temperature metrics demonstrated statistically significant relationships with daily firearm violence, with incidence rate ratios between 1.01 and 1.02 per degree Fahrenheit increase (1.02 and 1.04 per degree Celsius increase). However, multivariate analyses revealed more complex patterns. When daily maximum temperature was included with other metrics, it remained the only significant predictor, with each standard deviation increase associated with a 25% increase in daily incidents. When daily apparent maximum temperature replaced daily maximum temperature, daily deviation from normal temperature became the sole significant predictor, with each standard deviation increase associated with a 12% increase in incidents.
conclusionsFindings suggest different temperature dimensions might be related to firearm violence through distinct pathways. Absolute temperature effects and relative temperature deviations represent separate constructs that independently contribute to weather-gun violence relationships. This complexity supports the need for comprehensive monitoring systems that track both extreme temperatures and departures from seasonal norms to identify periods of elevated risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.