Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42814673›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

A high intensity vs. casual speed walking intervention to reverse frailty among older adults: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Margaret Danilovich, Daniel S Rubin, David E Conroy, Laura Diaz, Ying Cheung, Daniel Corcos, Lauren Balmert Bonner

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03654807 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of High Intensity Walking on Frailty

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2018 to 2024Enrolled156ConditionsFrailtyArmsHigh Intensity Walking, Casual Speed Walking
NCT03709251 naterminatednot on this map

High Intensity Walking to Reduce Frailty

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled59ConditionsFrailtyArmsHigh Intensity Walking, Casual Speed Walking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margaret DanilovichDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Daniel S RubinDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-1186
David E ConroySchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Laura DiazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Ying CheungDepartment of Preventive Medicine (Biostatistics), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6092-7375
Daniel CorcosDepartment of Physical Therapy & Human Movement Sciences and McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-6458
Lauren Balmert BonnerDepartment of Preventive Medicine (Biostatistics), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Study in Parkinson Disease of Exercise Phase 3 Clinical Trial: SPARX3U01NS113851 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniel M. Corcos · 2019 to 2026
$29.6M
The Effect of High Intensity Walking on FrailtyR01AG060162 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DANILOVICH, MARGARET K · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
At-home gait-cadence functional assessment and recovery trajectory for older adults undergoing major abdominal surgeryR03AG078957 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI RUBIN, DANIEL STEVEN · 2022 to 2023
$328k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060162NIA NIH HHS R03 AG078957NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS113851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions to reduce frailty and promote healthy aging are critical to improving quality of life and reducing disability in older adults. Walking is the most common form of exercise among older adults; however, the optimal walking intensity for prefrail and frail adults remains unclear. We conducted a cluster-randomized, assessor- and participant-blinded trial to determine whether high-intensity walking (HIW) improves frailty more than casual-speed walking (CSW). Fourteen retirement communities were randomized to either HIW or CSW using a modified minimal sufficient balance randomization scheme. We recruited 165 prefrail and frail adults aged ≥60 years, of whom 105 were included in the analytic cohort. Participants were able to ambulate at least 10 feet with moderate assistance or less. The HIW group targeted 70% of heart rate maximum (HRmax), while the CSW group walked at self-selected speeds below 60% HRmax. Supervised walking sessions were 45 minutes, three times per week, for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was improvement by at least one frailty category on the SHARE-FI (Survey of Health Among Retired Europeans - Frailty Index). Secondary outcomes included the Timed Up and Go, Short Physical Performance Battery, Berg Balance Scale, and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), measured at baseline and 16 weeks. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 79.2 (8.0) years; 79% were female, and 75% were non-Hispanic White. Improvement in frailty category occurred in 32 of 46 (69.6%) HIW participants versus 26 of 56 (46.4%) CSW participants (OR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.19-7.13, p = 0.02). HIW participants showed greater gains in gait speed (mean difference = 0.08 m/s, 95% CI 0.03-0.13, p = 0.036) and 6MWT distance (mean difference = 48.99 m, 95% CI 21.1-76.9, p = 0.0088). Mean HRmax was 71% in HIW vs. 59% in CSW (p < 0.001). Median completed sessions were similar (HIW = 35; CSW = 36; p = 0.07). This cluster-randomized trial demonstrates that high-intensity walking can reverse frailty more effectively than casual-speed walking due to increased physiologic stimuli during more intensive activity. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03654807 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03709251) Registered 10/12/2018.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyFrail ElderlyFrailtyWalkingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID42814673
PMCPMC13626343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.