ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
spMosaic: multi-sample integration for scalable spatial domain discovery based on spatial transcriptomics.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics enables high-resolution profiling of gene expression within intact tissue architecture, providing new opportunities to study the spatial organization of tissue structures and cell types. However, identifying spatial domains that are reproducible across samples and individuals remains challenging due to batch effects, inter-individual heterogeneity, increasing dataset sizes and the incomparability of spatial coordinates across independently processed tissue sections. We propose spMosaic, a scalable computational framework for multi-sample spatial domain identification. The method integrates two key components: (i) generalized additive model-based spatial smoothing to identify spatially variable genes shared across samples, and (ii) a batch-aware dual-encoder autoencoder that learns low-dimensional representations while encouraging sample-associated variation to be represented separately from domain-relevant biological variation. A subsequent deep embedded clustering refinement step further improves the separation and compactness of inferred domain assignments. We evaluated spMosaic against nine existing methods in both single-individual and multi-individual settings across diverse datasets spanning five technologies. spMosaic consistently achieved strong clustering performance relative to existing methods while maintaining competitive sample integration. In addition, under the computational settings used in our benchmark, spMosaic was the only method among those evaluated that successfully scaled to a large cohort, enabling the analysis of 378 918 spatial spots from 31 frontal cortex samples across 12 mice. These results demonstrate that spMosaic provides an integrative and scalable approach for multi-sample spatial transcriptomics analysis, enabling accurate and interpretable characterization of spatial tissue organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.