ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Disparities in HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Reversal and Abandonment by Race and Income: An Intersectional Approach.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Daily use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively prevents HIV, yet uptake remains uneven, particularly among lower socioeconomic and minoritized populations. Approximately 20% of newly approved PrEP prescriptions are reversed (a newly prescribed oral PrEP prescription that is not picked up at the pharmacy within 7-14 days), and most are subsequently abandoned (reversed prescription that is not picked up within a year). The roles of race and income in these outcomes are not well characterized. We analyzed Symphony HealthCare Analytics data on first-time, insurance-approved 30-day oral PrEP prescriptions for lower-income NHB, higher-income NHB, lower-income NHW, and higher-income NHW (referent group) men and women. Intersectional disparities in prescription reversal and abandonment were decomposed into joint, referent race, referent income, and excess intersectional components, stratified by gender. The total sample was 28,019, which included 2,463 women and 25,556 men. Among men, reversal and abandonment were higher among lower-income NHB men compared to higher-income NHW men. Joint disparities were 4.5% for reversal and 3.7% for abandonment, with less than half explained by race or income alone, suggesting an additional intersectional effect. Among women, reversal and abandonment were higher among higher-income NHW women compared to lower-income NHB women. Joint disparities were -11.4% and -12.9%, respectively, and were largely explained by independent race and income effects, with attenuation of intersectional disparities. Both financial and racial factors contribute to PrEP prescription reversal and abandonment, with patterns differing by gender. Interventions addressing cost barriers and structural inequities, alongside gender-specific strategies, may improve PrEP uptake and persistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814384What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.