ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
Dermocosmetics for Periocular Aging: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Integration with Aesthetic Procedures. A Narrative Review.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The periocular area, where facial skin is thinnest and most expressive, is often the first to reveal signs of aging. Aesthetic procedures can correct structural changes, but they do not replace daily, ongoing care. Dermocosmetics formulated specifically for the eye contour have become a standard complement to medical-aesthetic treatments, with potential preventive, corrective, and maintenance benefits. This narrative review summarizes the evidence on the efficacy and safety of these products and their role in a comprehensive approach to periocular rejuvenation. A literature search in PubMed (2010-2025) identified randomized trials, observational studies, and mechanistic research on periocular anatomy, active ingredients, and clinical outcomes. Retinoids, peptides, antioxidants, vasomodulators, and depigmenting agents improve hydration, firmness, pigment uniformity, and puffiness, particularly alongside aesthetic procedures. Most available studies, however, derive from finished multicomponent formulations rather than isolated ingredients; studies are short-term, industry-sponsored, and limited in participant diversity and endpoints, so further independent, long-term, periocular-specific studies are needed. Dermocosmetics for the eye contour may provide a noninvasive strategy that supports skin resilience and complements procedures within a comprehensive periocular rejuvenation strategy. Closer collaboration between dermatologists, aesthetic physicians, and cosmetic formulators would help translate this evidence into more consistent periocular rejuvenation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814367What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.