ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026
Screening and Evaluation Scheme for the Identification of Antisense Oligonucleotides with Antiviral Activity Against SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are advantageous for the development of antiviral drugs against respiratory viruses. However, the methodology for efficiently identifying antiviral ASOs has not been well established, and to date no ASOs have successfully been developed for treating viral respiratory diseases. In this chapter, we describe a scheme that consists of three stepwise evaluation assays to identify ASOs having antiviral effects against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative pathogen of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The primary evaluation employs a luciferase-based assay without virus infection, which can be applied to high-throughput screening without the need for a high biosafety level facility. The secondary evaluation exploits a cell-based infection assay that assesses antiviral activity by detecting SARS-CoV-2-induced cytopathic effects, viral RNA, and proteins. Candidate ASOs are then further evaluated in a mouse SARS-CoV-2 infection model by detecting viral propagation and pathogenesis in vivo. This scheme permits systematic identification of antiviral agents starting from a library with a large number of ASOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.