Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42814280›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2026

Exclusion by Design: Regulatory Reform and Evolving Frameworks for Clinical Trials in Pregnancy.

Gregory L Kearns, Agnes Saint-Raymond

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory L KearnsDepartment of Pediatrics, The Anne Burnett Marion School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, 1100 Rosedale Street, Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA. g.kearns@tcu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-429X
Agnes Saint-RaymondConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8056-8453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal-fetal pharmacology remains a critically underdeveloped domain, largely because ethical, regulatory, and methodological barriers impede evidence generation in pregnant populations (hereafter women). Pregnant women continue to be routinely excluded from clinical trials, creating both a knowledge and an evidence gap that can adversely affect maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite significant regulatory advances in both encouraging trial inclusion and improving labeling [1], for example through the implementation of the US Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule, substantial gaps and a lack of harmonization persist in pharmacologic, safety, and efficacy data for medications used during pregnancy and lactation. This targeted commentary examines the current state of medication use in pregnant women and their fetuses, the regulatory landscape, and the challenges that impede the development of new research in maternal-fetal pharmacology. We also identify the regulatory conundrum in selected countries worldwide and propose new strategies to improve evidence generation and regulatory decision making for this protected population.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.