ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026
Outpatient Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to evaluate the current landscape of outpatient reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, as well as summarize protocols to facilitate safe and effective patient selection and implementation. It also aims to demystify cost and reimbursement concerns surrounding this topic. RECENT
findingsFormal risk stratification, structured perioperative pathways, and proactive follow-up can make outpatient RTSA safe and highly effective. Medical comorbidity profile, age, social factors as well as non-medical barriers can all assist with decision making. Additionally, there are considerable cost savings that do not compromise outcomes or safety, which will drive more patients to receive outpatient RTSA. Caution should be exercised if considering RTSA for fracture as well as in a revision setting given the case unpredictability, anticipated blood loss and the possible need for a higher level of care. Further work is needed to standardize nomenclature in reporting care settings around outpatient RTSA. Outpatient RTSA can be safe and effective with careful patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.