ArticleJournal of ultrasound2026
Lung ultrasound: a new approach for detection of severity of COVID-19 viral pneumonia and associated mortality.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesLung ultrasound has established itself as a dependable bedside imaging modality, with demonstrated concordance with computed tomography in the assessment of pulmonary abnormalities. Prior studies have also validated its utility in identifying COVID-19-associated lung pathology. In this context, the present study aims to evaluate the correlation between lung ultrasound findings and clinical parameters in order to determine its effectiveness in assessing disease severity and predicting mortality among patients with COVID-19 infection.
methodsThis study enrolled hospitalized patients with microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, who were clinically stratified into mild (absence of moderate or severe COVID-19 symptoms), moderate (respiratory rate ≥24/min or SpO₂ <94% on room air) and severe disease categories (respiratory rate ≥30/min, SpO₂ <90% on room air, or requirement for non-invasive/invasive mechanical ventilation). For systematic lung ultrasound evaluation, each lung was divided into 7 anatomical zones-comprising 2 anterior, 2 axillary and 3 posterior zones-resulting in a total of 14 assessed zones. The primary objective was to comprehensively evaluate the correlation between lung ultrasound profiles and established clinical parameters, including PF and SF ratios. Secondary objectives were to investigate the association of lung ultrasound findings with clinical disease severity and mortality, while also establishing optimal prognostic cut-off values for mortality prediction.
resultsAmong the total cohort of 60 patients, B-line abnormalities involving at least one lung zone were identified in 88.33% of cases. The total number of lung zones demonstrating ultrasonographic abnormalities (B/B' or C/C' profiles) showed a significant negative correlation with both PF ratio (ρ = - 0.7232, p < 0.0001) and SF ratio (ρ = - 0.6866, p < 0.0001). A simplified threshold of ≥10 abnormal lung zones demonstrated 71.43% sensitivity and 72.00% specificity in distinguishing severe from non-severe illness. The total B-line burden was significantly associated with mortality, with a cut-off of ≥35 B-lines yielding 65.38% sensitivity and 58.82% specificity for mortality prediction.
conclusionA greater extent of pulmonary abnormalities detected on lung ultrasound demonstrates significant correlation with clinical severity and patient outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia. These findings support the potential role of lung ultrasound in future prospective studies as an effective and safer modality for triaging and prognosticating patients with viral pneumonia other than COVID-19 in any resource-limited setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.