ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026
Does more generous health insurance reimbursement lead to moral hazard? Evidence from large-scale administrative data in China.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper exploits the discrete increase in reimbursement rates at the statutory retirement age as a quasi-natural experiment to examine ex post moral hazard in inpatient care in China. Using nationally representative administrative data covering more than 450,000 hospitalization records across 29 provinces, we implement a cohort difference-in-differences design to identify the causal effect of insurance generosity on healthcare utilization. We find that a 5-percentage-point increase in reimbursement rates increases length of stay by 1.73 days and total inpatient expenditures by RMB 709.98. The additional spending is primarily financed by the insurance pool, while patients' out-of-pocket payments decline, consistent with moral hazard predictions. Decomposition results show that the spending increase is concentrated in diagnostic services, pharmaceutical use, and inpatient care components such as bed and nursing services, rather than high-intensity treatments. Further analysis highlights the role of supply-side institutional constraints: under the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) payment system, utilization responses are largely muted, whereas under non-DIP regimes they remain substantial. In addition, moral hazard is concentrated in secondary hospitals. Overall, these findings suggest that moral hazard in inpatient care reflects demand-side price responsiveness and manifests differently across supply-side institutional environments. This institutional heterogeneity also underscores the potential importance of provider payment reform in health insurance policy design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.