ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026
A transfer learning-based hybrid deep- and machine-learning regression approach for predicting the postoperative pulmonary function.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAccurately predicting postoperative pulmonary function is essential for surgical decision-making in patients with pulmonary nodules. Here, we developed a hybrid model using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and evaluated its accuracy and interpretability for predicting postoperative pulmonary function. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 136 patients who underwent preoperative chest CT and postoperative pulmonary function tests. A pre-trained Inflated 3D ConvNet (I3D) model was fine-tuned for transfer learning to predict the postoperative pulmonary function, and the resulting model served as the feature extractor. Extracted deep learning features were combined with an elastic net regression for prediction. Models established using clinical features or radiomics with elastic net, end-to-end I3D transfer learning, and 3D ResNet18 trained from scratch were compared, with additional evaluation against a conventional segment-counting method. Performance was evaluated against spirometry, and interpretability was assessed using Grad-CAM.
resultsThe hybrid model exhibited the best external test performance. For postoperative forced vital capacity (FVC) prediction, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.707, the Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson r) was 0.796, and the R-squared (R
conclusionThe hybrid elastic net model based on fine-tuned I3D features predicted postoperative pulmonary function without requiring preoperative spirometry or detailed surgical planning and may guide the development of future predictive models. KEY POINTS: Question CT-only prediction of postoperative pulmonary function remains an unmet clinical need due to the non-routine use of pulmonary function testing. Findings A hybrid CT-based model enables prediction of postoperative pulmonary function and outperforms conventional segment-counting, clinical, radiomics, and end-to-end deep learning approaches. Relevance Statement This hybrid CT-based model can estimate postoperative pulmonary function from routine preoperative non-contrast CT images, potentially assisting surgical decision-making for lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.